This policy binds how editorial staff and reviewers treat educational content tied to risky financial hardware workloads. It exists so miners see how articles get stress-tested—not just published.
Core comparison articles undergo quarterly factual sweeps comparing published fee tables vs on-site disclosures, verifying Stratum endpoints and ports, validating dashboard screenshots versus current UX, and logging change notes at the bottom of refreshed posts. Tactical playbooks are revalidated after major firmware revs or measurable pool behavior shifts (difficulty clamps, websocket payload changes).
Factual inaccuracies are corrected inline with visible change logs referencing the mistaken statement. If remediation cannot be cleanly layered (e.g., obsolete hardware guidance), editors may retract the artifact and preserve a succinct notice describing why. Readers can notify contact with citations and reproducible miner logs.
Automated assistants may accelerate outlines, yet every published guide passes human technical review aligned with this checklist. AI-generated speculative claims never ship without empirical backing.